Making AI Work for the Public: Why the ALT Framework Matters for Federal Contractors
A New America/RethinkAI report urges governments to move beyond AI “efficiency” toward an ALT framework—Adapt, Listen, Trust. For federal contractors, that means proposals must forecast demand surges, build institutional context, and prove trustworthiness with measurable public outcomes, aligning solutions to tightening state guardrails and CIO-led enterprise adoption.
Why MAS Refresh 30 Matters: Interpreting GSA’s RFO-Aligned Clause Overhaul
GSA’s MAS Refresh 30 implements the Revolutionary FAR Overhaul for schedule holders, replacing legacy clauses with RFO-aligned deviations, revising SCP-FSS-001 and I-FSS-644, tightening UAS security prohibitions, and streamlining OLM rules. Federal contractors must rebuild compliance matrices, update proposal templates, and realign supplier controls to remain award-ready under the new regime.
From Uncertainty to Enterprise Value: Insights from WorldCC on the Quality of Contracting
Based on a World Commerce & Contracting (WorldCC) presentation, this article explains how “quality of contracting” turns uncertainty into enterprise value. Learn the operating playbook, capability gaps to close, and why AI magnifies the advantage of organizations that align people, process, and systems.
From OODA to GDSD: Why Federal Contractors Should Rethink Data, Decisions, and Risk
A new framework—Goals, Decisions, Signals, Data (GDSD)—shows federal contractors how to cut through data saturation, align analytics to mission outcomes, improve supplier risk detection, and justify contractual decisions with targeted, audit-ready signals. Learn why replacing OODA with GDSD can boost performance, compliance, and resilience.
Big Contract Compliance Burdens Aren’t Just a Problem for Contractors
Federal News Network’s interview with Aron Beezley, hosted by Terry Gerton (with questions from Jared Serbu), explains how FAR-driven requirements now burden agencies and contractors alike—especially as universities move into traditional procurements. For vendors, “compliance by design” and standardized evidence reduce oversight friction, speed evaluations, and protect margins.
Public AI, Private Opportunity: What Multilateral AI Means for Federal Contractors
Public AI—shared, government-aligned AI infrastructure—is moving from idea to policy. Here’s what it means for federal contractors: multilateral frameworks (GPAI, G7 Hiroshima), compliance-first engineering, and capture strategies that emphasize interoperability, governance, and measurable public value.
When Washington Rethinks FEMA: Why Potential Reforms Matter for Federal Contractors
A policy push to reform FEMA can reshape disaster funding, acquisition rules, and mitigation priorities—directly affecting federal contractors across logistics, construction, IT, and resilience. Learn how potential shifts in Stafford Act thresholds, cost shares, emergency flexibilities, and domestic preference could alter pipelines, compliance duties, and performance expectations.
Part 52, Recast: Why the FAR Overhaul’s Clause Architecture Matters for Contractors
The FAR Overhaul rewires Part 52, reserving many legacy clauses and introducing the 52.240 series tied to new Part 40 security policies. Learn what moved, what’s new (e.g., 52.204-90/-91, 52.207-6), and why contractors must update clause matrices, proposals, and subcontracts now as agencies implement model deviation text across solicitations and awards.
Inside GSA’s Playbook for OMB M-25-21—and Why It Matters to Contractors
GSA’s strategy for implementing OMB M-25-21 details how federal agencies will scale AI through a tiered use-case model, USAi shared services, FedRAMP “20x,” CAIO-led governance, and public AI inventories. For contractors, it foreshadows evaluation artifacts, telemetry expectations, and acquisition pathways (e.g., OneGov) that will shape requirements, compliance, and competitive advantage.
The Federal Playbook on Project Labor Agreements: What Contractors Need to Know
Federal Acquisition Institute’s PLA training outlines the post-EO 14063 framework requiring Project Labor Agreements on most $35M+ federal construction. Key points include inclusive market research, timing and clauses (FAR 52.222-33/-34), IDIQ treatment, narrow SPE-approved exceptions, and fast OMB reporting—vital guidance for contractors pursuing large federal builds.
What’s Your Form? Why the Evolution of Government Service Delivery Matters for Contractors
A summary of “What’s your form? The evolution of government service delivery,” explaining how forms evolved from paper to AI-enabled platforms and why this shift matters for U.S. federal contractors. Learn how to turn compliance into measurable value—improving CX, equity, security, and outcomes—by treating the “form” as a policy instrument and a trust interface.
States Most & Least Affected by the Government Shutdown: A Summary of WalletHub’s Findings
WalletHub’s “Government Shutdown Report” ranks how the 2025 funding lapse affects every state and D.C., blending five metrics—federal jobs, contract dollars, real estate dependence, SNAP participation, and national park access. D.C., Hawaii, and New Mexico face the greatest strain, while Minnesota is least affected. Here’s what the methodology and early economic estimates signal.
Helping the J&A Without Crossing the Line: How Federal Contractors Can Support a Contracting Officer’s Justification
How federal contractors can (ethically) help contracting officers with J&As: strengthen market research via detailed RFI responses, offer open interfaces and data-rights paths, provide audit-ready price evidence, propose bounded bridge solutions, and execute roadmaps that restore competition—improving the accuracy and defensibility of noncompetitive actions.
“Time to Choose”: Why DoD’s New DFARS Conflict-of-Interest Rule Matters for Consulting Contractors
DoD’s new DFARS rule implementing NDAA §812 restricts awards under NAICS 5416 to consulting firms with foreign government ties unless they certify compliance or deliver an auditable mitigation plan. Effective Oct. 24, 2025, it extends to affiliates, raises protest risks, and demands robust global governance and information barriers.
Governing Through “Mock Precision”: Why It Matters to Federal Contractors
An academic summary of “Governing through guesstimates,” explaining why international organisations present uncertain data with “mock precision,” why this persists, and why it matters to U.S. federal contractors. Learn how IO-sourced numbers shape policies, compliance, and risk—and how to respond with due diligence, sensitivity analyses, and defensible program design.
Shutdown News for Federal Contractors: Why a New Bill and a DoD Class Deviation Matter
A new bill would guarantee back pay for federal contract workers after shutdowns, while a DoD class deviation lets contracting officers obligate funds for essential work despite lapsed appropriations. Here’s why both moves matter for contractor risk, workforce stability, and mission continuity, based on Terry Gerton’s interview with PSC’s Stephanie Kostro for Federal News Network.
Why the State Department’s 2025 TIP Report Matters for Federal Contractors
The State Department’s 2025 Trafficking in Persons Report maps global anti-trafficking performance and informs federal procurement risk. Learn why Tier rankings and enforcement trends matter for FAR 52.222-50/-56 compliance, supply-chain due diligence, and debarment exposure—and how contractors can translate the report’s insights into practical CTIP controls and sourcing decisions
Georgia Tech Cyber Case: From Allegations to Settlement—and What It Signals for DoD Contractors
DOJ announced that Georgia Tech Research Corporation will pay $875,000 to resolve allegations it failed to meet DoD cybersecurity requirements, including NIST SP 800-171 controls and accurate self-assessment reporting. This update explains the settlement’s key facts, ties to our prior coverage, and the practical implications for defense contractors as CMMC formalizes assessment expectations.
Dynamic Capabilities in City Governments: Why Contractors Should Pay Attention
A new UCL IIPP report proposes a Public Sector Capabilities Index to assess how cities sense change, shift priorities, build coalitions, learn, and reconfigure delivery. For government contractors, aligning proposals to these five “dynamic capabilities” can improve win rates, de-risk innovation, and deliver lasting institutional capacity.
Constructive Changes: Recognition, Examples, and Requests for Equitable Adjustment
Constructive changes occur when government conduct expands contract performance without a formal modification. Learn the common patterns—overinspection, acceleration, defective specs, nondisclosure—and how to respond with timely notice, disciplined cost capture, and a persuasive REA or CDA claim that satisfies certification, decision, and interest rules under the FAR and CDA.